|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning on Jul 16, 2019 19:39:17 GMT -5
That’s fantastic. He wasn’t in his own team’s top 4 and most WAR models have him barely above replacement level. He’s a fine young D, probably capable of top 4, definitely an NHLer. Is he really the best case study we can come up with to complain about a rating package? I'm the victim here, but somebody else is complaing. If you're going to use a WAR model, then how do ou explain using evolving hockey's model, Andersson being rated as at least positive WAR, while the guy I traded away, Adam Larsson, having a negative WAR value but yet having a good rating in the game? I'm not shitting on the rating model, becuase I know it favours certain counting stats and TOI. |
|
|
|
Post by Dallas Stars on Jul 16, 2019 19:40:59 GMT -5
I just bumped Anderson’s LD and EX to a 70 in both categories temporarily as I’m redoing the entire LD and EX. Now He’s a 71.
As mentioned we are still editing categories.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Jul 16, 2019 21:27:47 GMT -5
I just bumped Anderson’s LD and EX to a 70 in both categories temporarily as I’m redoing the entire LD and EX. Now He’s a 71. As mentioned we are still editing categories. Are you still editing categories? Maybe we should edit bios too. |
|
|
|
Post by Utah Hockey Club on Jul 16, 2019 23:03:40 GMT -5
Things are getting pretty beefy in here. Squash the beef boys. I say beef up the squash boys. #vegetarianbros |
|
|
|
Post by Montreal Canadiens on Jul 17, 2019 12:57:24 GMT -5
LMAO keyboard warrior is strong in this basement Actually I don't have a a basement. Got any more 10 year old comments? Or is it time for you to go back to the retirement community? Ah but yes, let's build our team on a ratings package. Seems logical. Your're an idiot lol |
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Jul 17, 2019 13:17:10 GMT -5
Actually I don't have a a basement. Got any more 10 year old comments? Or is it time for you to go back to the retirement community? Ah but yes, let's build our team on a ratings package. Seems logical. Your're an idiot lol There are a lot of things I could point out, such as the lack of examples you've provided to justify your claim, but, I'm just going to #SquashTheBeef. |
|
|
|
Post by Columbus Blue Jackets on Jul 17, 2019 13:19:54 GMT -5
Dear schedule maker........
Please day 1 schedule Calgary vs Montreal
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Flyers on Jul 17, 2019 13:25:10 GMT -5
Dear schedule maker........ Please day 1 schedule Calgary vs Montreal You got it. |
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Jul 17, 2019 13:28:23 GMT -5
Dear schedule maker........ Please day 1 schedule Calgary vs Montreal Pops is going to get beefed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2019 0:13:26 GMT -5
So I've been looking through the rules and asked a few people and I still can't figure out this part:
"However, please note that overall is not the best indication to look at a player. It is best to look at specific categories and determine what role you need from them to fill."
Do we know how various traits work for or against other traits? Like how would someone know if they should prefer a speedy 77 instead of a slower 80? The part I've quoted makes it sound as though specific traits matter more than overall so is there somewhere that explains how trait combinations work for or against each other? I'm assuming it would be important to know how various traits affect how a team plays.
|
|
