|
Post by Utah Hockey Club on Jul 28, 2021 14:58:42 GMT -5
I'm happy to release the 2020-2021 ratings package. This has been quite the project to work on, but I think all the grunt work now will set-up the league for years of standardized ratings to come. I'm happy to say that every rating category has been created using real-world data so is strictly objective and not subjective. I started this project back in April with the goal to build a model to be used over and over again. I used 2019-2020 data to build last year's ratings from scratch to test and compare against the ratings we used this year. While there were some things that were great about this past year's ratings, I found some other ratings not nearly as accurate as I'd like. Proof that the model works is that it took me a grand total of 30min to download the necessary datasets for goalies and execute the model to spit out the 2020-2021 goalie ratings. The model consists of ~1400 lines of code for players and ~450 lines for goalies. For those interested, the model is built with the Python programming language using the Pandas, NumPy and SciKit-Learn libraries. Please let me know if you have any questions. I am more than happy to explain how certain things were calculated. If you have an issue with why ratings are a certain way, let me know and how you'd like them calculated. I can run the model with the updated calculations to see how the ratings would turn out differently. Without further adieu: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m28C3PuS3NL5gqp9qJx76jLxOUK9KOuu77U0EFQhBt4/edit?usp=sharing
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Jul 28, 2021 15:19:26 GMT -5
This is bullshit all my players are rated too low!! Quick's not even in the top 20!!!
Just kidding, thanks for all the hard work Doog, this will help our league so damn much!
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Hull on Jul 28, 2021 15:53:51 GMT -5
wow good job alot of hard work, looks pretty awesome!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chris Groenink on Jul 28, 2021 21:09:00 GMT -5
YES! thank you, now i can start planning. This is some impressive work dude, awesome stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Montreal Canadiens on Jul 28, 2021 21:28:42 GMT -5
4 fwd in top 40 and 3 def in top 40 should give me a good chance? Some outliers of course like Gustufssan being a top 85 d man but it looks amazing, and im sure it was tons of work so tks!!
|
|
|
Post by Calgary Flames on Jul 29, 2021 7:12:07 GMT -5
4 fwd in top 40 and 3 def in top 40 should give me a good chance? Some outliers of course like Gustufssan being a top 85 d man but it looks amazing, and im sure it was tons of work so tks!! Holy shit, you complimented a ratings package? Progress!
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Sabres on Jul 29, 2021 9:26:26 GMT -5
4 fwd in top 40 and 3 def in top 40 should give me a good chance? Some outliers of course like Gustufssan being a top 85 d man but it looks amazing, and im sure it was tons of work so tks!! Holy shit, you complimented a ratings package? Progress! that's the truest test to any ratings package! thanks for all your hard work Adam. I have no idea what most of the words mean you said about programming. lol
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Flyers on Jul 29, 2021 10:06:41 GMT -5
Why is Tyler Pitlick not rated 99 across the board??
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Jul 29, 2021 14:43:49 GMT -5
well i got work to d0...
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Sabres on Jul 29, 2021 20:52:04 GMT -5
we been telling you that for two years!
|
|